COOPER COMPANIES INSIDERS SELL
Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Once again, corporate insiders know the right time to sell. 
The best time, of course, to sell is before bad news is 
disclosed. In this instance, sellers who did well are the 
insiders at Cooper Companies (NYSE: COO), and those 
who suffered the most are the purchasers of COO stock 
between July 29, 2004 and November 21, 2005, as well 
as those investors who received Cooper Companies 
shares in exchange for their shares of Ocular Sciences.

Specifically, among other things, it has been alleged that 
Cooper Companies improperly accounted for assets 
acquired in the Ocular Sciences mergers by misclassifying 
intangible assets as tangible ones which had the effect of 
lowering amortization expense. It is also alleged that 
Cooper's aggressive earnings guidance reflected the 
improper accounting for intangible assets and was 
inflated by the amount of the understated amortization 
expense. Moreover, it has alleged that the merger 
synergies between Cooper Companies and Ocular 
Sciences touted by Cooper Companies were unrealistic 
and Ocular had stuffed the channel with its Biomedics 
products lens market. 

Before Thanksgiving last year, the truth began to 
emerge. On November 22, 2005, Cooper fell 
$21 per share, or 29%, to close at $51.47 per share 
on November 22, 2005. 

But some insiders at Cooper didn’t feel the same sting 
in this drop that other investors felt. Specifically, during 
the Class Period, insiders sold 1,970,233 shares of 
common stock for proceeds of $141,492,613. They knew 
when to sell.

Again, affected investors are those who purchased COO 
between July 29, 2004 and November 21, 2005 and those 
who received COO in exchange for their shares of 
Ocular Sciences.


Chicago Bridge and Iron Update

At the end of last week a securities class action was filed 
against Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V. (NYSE: CBI), 
an international engineering, procurement, and construction 
company, for allegedly making materially false and 
misleading statements which caused Chicago Bridge's 
securities to trade at artificially inflated prices during the 
period between March 9, 2005 and February 3, 2006.

On October 26, 2005, Chicago Bridge issued a press release 
announcing that it would be delaying the release of its third 
quarter financial results because the results were not 
"finalized in time to meet the original schedule". On 
October 31, 2005, Chicago Bridge issued a press release 
announcing a delay in its release of third quarter financial 
results that was "precipitated by a memo from a senior 
member of CB&I's accounting department alleging 
accounting improprieties, including the determination of 
claim recognition on two projects and the assessment of 
costs to complete two projects." 

Then, on February 3, 2006, after the close of the market, 
Chicago Bridge issued a press release announcing the 
terminations of the Company’s CEO and COO. Two hours 
after the announcement of the terminations, an attorney 
representing the former executives issued a press release 
representing that they had been terminated in connection 
with the Company's internal accounting investigation. 

In response to these announcements, on February 6, 2006, 
the price of Chicago Bridge stock dropped from 
$29.00 per share to $22.33 per share on extremely heavy 
trading volume.

Investors who purchased between March 9, 2005 and 
February 3, 2006, are affected.

If you are an affected investor in Chicago Bridge & Iron 
or Cooper Companies or any of the other cases listed below 
under investigation, please do not hesitate to contact us at 
info@securitiessleuth.com or 877.511.4717.

Cases Under Investigation

ProQuest Company (PQE) On February 9, 2006, the Company 
announced that it had discovered material irregularities in 
its accounting and would have to restate certain of its 
previously issued financial statements. Its stock plummeted 
on this news. Investors who purchased ProQuest between 
January 9, 2003 and February 8, 2006 are affected. 

Applica Inc. (APN) On April 20, 2005, the Company revealed 
that its business was suffering and that it was marking 
down inventory and experiencing increased warranty 
expenses. Investors who purchased Applica between 
November 4, 2004 and April 28, 2005 are affected.

Amkor (AMKR) The Company’s stock plunged 25% after 
its was disclosed that its gross margins had declined 
materially and that its “product mix” had turned unfavorable.
Investors who purchased Amkor between October 27, 2003 
and July 1, 2004, are affected.

Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) Since 
January 18, 2006, Take Two investors have been stung by 
a series of negative announcements. On January 25, 2006, 
the Company’s audit committee chairwoman resigned and 
stated that management failed to keep the board informed 
of key issues. Among other things, the Company is currently 
being investigated by the FTC for possibly engaging in unfair 
or deceptive practice in the sale of its Grand Theft Auto 
video game. Investors who purchased between 
October 25, 2004 and January 27, 2006 are affected. 

Dot Hill Systems Corp. (HILL) On February 3, 2005, the 
Company announced its preliminary Fourth Quarter financial 
results and that it would be restating its 2004 unaudited 
financial results due to a data entry error that the Company 
attributed to “the material weaknesses in its internal control 
over its financial closing process.” Investors who purchased 
HILL between April 23, 2003 and February 3, 2005 
are affected.


Now with respect to settled cases. If you are an affected 
investor – you purchased any of these stocks during the 
relevant class period, you may wish to contact the claims 
administrator to obtain additional information. Remember, 
if you don’t submit your claim form, you won’t receive your 
proportionate share of recovery.

Eagle Building Technologies (EGBT)
Class Period: November 21, 2000 to February 14, 2002
Claims Deadline: May 1, 2006
Claims Administrator: Berdon

eFunds Corporation (EFD)
Class Period: July 21, 20000 to October 24, 2002
Claims Deadline: May 5, 2006
Claims Administrator: Gilardi

Uniroyal Technology Corp.(UTCIQ)
Class Period: February 8, 2000 to May 13, 2002
Claims Deadline: June 28, 2006
Claims Administrator: Garden City

Solectron Corp. (SLR)
Class Period: June 18, 2001 to September 26, 2002
Claims Deadline: March 28, 2006
Claims Administrator: Garden City

NUI Corp. (NUI)
Class Period: November 8, 2001 to October 17, 2002
Claims Deadline: March 7, 2006
Claims Administrator: Garden City

Asia Pulp & Paper Company, Ltd. (APUUY)
Class Period: August 28, 1999 to April 4, 2001
Claims Deadline: March 6, 2006
Claims Administrator: Analytics

Cornell Companies, Inc. (CRN)
Class Period: March 6, 2001 to March 5, 2002
Claims Deadline: March 3, 2006
Claims Administrator: Gilardi

Again, if you are affected by a settled case, then you should 
contact the claims administrator (rather than us). However, 
if you are an affected investor in any of the companies under 
investigation, you many wish to contact us so that you 
can consider your options. 

Likewise, if you happen to be aware of corporate restatements 
or other financial fraud -- especially if you're a victim -- 
you're encouraged to contribute to the Sleuth by giving your 
own tip-offs at www.securitiessleuth.com or by e-mailing 
info@securitiessleuth.com. You can also call Mark McNair 
at 877-511-4717. If you have a friend or colleague you 
think would benefit from The Sleuth, please pass along 
this issue and ask them to sign up at 
www.cartville.com/app/join.asp?MerchantID=47994.

Warmest regards,

Mark McNair


 

 ©2005, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED, SECURITIES SLEUTH